Scientific articles

“Soylent Green 2.0?” A Qualitative Analysis of Online Comments on Cultivated Meat in Germany and the Netherlands
September 2026
The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food
Martina Felicitas Baumann, Laurens Landeweerd, Denise van Baalen
Abstract
Cultivated meat attracts growing attention not only in news media and among experts and investors but also in social media discussions and online newspaper comments. While not representative of the general public, such comments offer valuable insights into public attitudes, perceptions, and concerns. We analysed 491 German and Dutch online comments to explore perceived benefits, risks, and barriers to cultivated meat development. Many commenters expressed optimism about sustainability and animal welfare benefits, yet concerns about health risks, fairness, and unnaturalness were widespread. Overall, attitudes were predominantly negative and highly polarised. We identify several contributing factors: polarising media events, societal divides around sustainability and responsibility, distrust in institutions and industry, over-promising technological narratives, and the spread of misinformation. These findings underscore the need for transparent communication, inclusive dialogue, and more nuanced public debate on the societal implications of emerging food technologies.

Probiotic-Based Materials as Living Therapeutics
25 September 2025
Advanced Materials, e08500
Laura Sabio, Graham J. Day, Manuel Salmeron-Sanchez
Abstract
The growing demand for safer, more targeted therapeutics requires the development of advanced biomaterials. Among these, Engineered Living Materials (ELMs)—which integrate synthetic biology with material science—are emerging as promising platforms for biomedical applications. This review focuses on a subclass of ELMs based on genetically engineered probiotics combined with matrices, that are termed Probiotic Living Materials (PLMs) to differentiate them from Living Biotherapeutic Products (LBPs). Recent studies highlight PLM’s potential in addressing different health conditions, offering targeted and dynamic therapies. However, PLMs face multiple challenges to be implemented in clinics, including a lack of robust genetic toolkits for probiotic engineering, concerns about biosafety (e.g., horizontal gene transfer or non-desirable biological activity), difficulties in translating preclinical results to humans, and the absence of clear regulatory guidance for clinical use. This review first explores the fundamental features of ELMs, then provides an overview of probiotics, followed by recent advances in the design of engineered PLMs for biomedical applications, particularly in biosensing development, infection treatment, bone repair, wound healing, vaginal imbalances, gut-related conditions, and cancer therapy. Finally, biosafety issues and current gaps in regulatory frameworks to ensure safe and effective use of PLMs, with a particular focus on vulnerable populations, are discussed.

The Future of Automated Tissue Engineering: Robotic-Assisted Strategies for Complex 3D Tissue Bottom-Up Assembly
4 May 2025
Advanced Materials Technologies, Volume10, Issue16, 70000
Ana Margarida Almeida, João Mazeda, Ana Rita Pinho, Maria Clara Gomes, João Filipe Mano
Abstract
Over the years, the need for novel solutions to replace damaged tissues has led to the development of new tissue-engineering strategies. Bottom-up approaches have gained interest for mimicking the hierarchical cellular organization and intricate nature of tissues. Among these approaches, automated-assisted techniques, such as robotic handling, have the potential to precisely control the spatial organization of building blocks, allowing the creation of highly specific functional tissues. Recognizing the potential of robotic handling in tissue engineering, this review provides an overview of robot-assisted bottom-up approaches for engineering complex tissues, highlighting the advantages and limitations of various systems currently being explored. To address the growing interest in this field, this review also discusses key considerations for the assembly of complex living tissues, while providing insights into future directions and challenges in this rapidly evolving field.

Strategies to decouple cell micro-scale and macro-scale environments for designing multifunctional biomimetic tissues.
25 July 2024
Soft Matter, volume 20, pages 6,313-6,326
Ghasemzadeh-Hasankolaei, Maryam, Pinheiro, Diogo, Nadine, Sara, Mano, João F.
Abstract
The regulation of cellular behavior within a three-dimensional (3D) environment to execute a specific function remains a challenge in the field of tissue engineering. In native tissues, cells and matrices are arranged into 3D modular units, comprising biochemical and biophysical signals that orchestrate specific cellular activities. Modular tissue engineering aims to emulate this natural complexity through the utilization of functional building blocks with unique stimulation features. By adopting a modular approach and using well-designed biomaterials, cellular microenvironments can be effectively decoupled from their macro-scale surroundings, enabling the development of engineered tissues with enhanced multifunctionality and heterogeneity. We overview recent advancements in decoupling the cellular micro-scale niches from their macroenvironment and evaluate the implications of this strategy on cellular and tissue functionality.
Theses & dissertations

The influence of viscoelastic properties of bioinks on 3D bioprinted tissue models – A study of cell behaviour and printability
8 June 2023
Master’s thesis in Master’s Programme Biotechnology by Sofie Ekström
Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology
Abstract
The recent advancement within the field of 3D bioprinting has enabled its appli cation in areas such as the pharmaceutical industry, tissue engineering and many types of cell-based research. The principle is to utilize 3D printing technology to print a variety of biomaterials together with viable cells, to produce accurate tissue models by mimicking the in vivo cell environment. Bioinks used for 3D bioprint ing are commonly composed of hydrogels based on naturally derived polymers like gelatin, collagen, alginate and nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC). Bioinks are viscoelas tic materials which can be crosslinked after being printed to keep their structure and shape. The crosslinking method and conditions determine the stiffness of the result ing tissue construct, which can in turn also affect the behaviour of incorporated cells. This study aims to investigate the influence of the bioink’s viscoelastic properties on both cell behaviour and printability of the bionink. The studied bioinks include CELLINK Bioink, GelMA, GelMA C, GelXA and Photogel95, which are crosslinked either ionically using a CaCl2 solution or using photo-crosslinking, or a combination of the two. The bioinks’ viscoelastic properties, as well as stiffness after crosslinking at two different conditions for each bioink were investigated using rheological measure ments, showing that different stiffnesses could be achieved. 3D bioprinting of the bioinks with mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) was used to produce samples which were crosslinked at the same two conditions, cultured over 14 days and analyzed at several time points. The cell viability was evaluated by fluorescent staining using Calcein-AM and propidium iodide (PI), and the cell morphology by using Actin Green and DAPI, followed by fluorescent microscopy imaging. The stiffness of the cell samples over time was also evaluated by measurements at the same time points. The stiffness of the cell samples over time showed some unexpected results and high variation between samples, which can to some extent be explained by the method not being fully suitable and well-adapted for these samples. The cell viability was relatively high at day 1 for all bioinks and crosslinking conditions, above 90 % for most samples but around 80 % for a few. A decrease in cell viability was then observed for all samples at day 7 and day 14. The cell morphology analysis showed cells spreading in all gelMA-based bioinks at day 7 and day 14, except for Photogel95. However, no distinct correlations between the stiffnesses achieved at the different crosslinking conditions and the cell behaviour could be determined.